<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast Episode 039</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audioshocker.com/2008/07/15/podcast-episode-039/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2008/07/15/podcast-episode-039</link>
	<description>Music. Movies. Comic Books. Pop Culture. Media is kind of our thing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2008/07/15/podcast-episode-039#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioshocker.com/?p=226#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interview, Nick. I guess I should have held the phone further away from my mouth.


http://www.candyormedicine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interview, Nick. I guess I should have held the phone further away from my mouth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.candyormedicine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.candyormedicine.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2008/07/15/podcast-episode-039#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioshocker.com/?p=226#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>agreed. though i have to say that i don't think the quality is too bad this time around. i've definitely had to edit interviews with worse audio before (marc's audio on here was tough because i had to go in by hand and raise his volume levels for everytime that he talked...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. though i have to say that i don&#8217;t think the quality is too bad this time around. i&#8217;ve definitely had to edit interviews with worse audio before (marc&#8217;s audio on here was tough because i had to go in by hand and raise his volume levels for everytime that he talked&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neal</title>
		<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2008/07/15/podcast-episode-039#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioshocker.com/?p=226#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>sorry for the crappy audio quality folks - until we find a better way to do interviews it's GrandCentral all the way. 

Hey google - we'd love to help you test out new versions/additions to the service. we are big fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the crappy audio quality folks - until we find a better way to do interviews it&#8217;s GrandCentral all the way. </p>
<p>Hey google - we&#8217;d love to help you test out new versions/additions to the service. we are big fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
