<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Darjeeling (should have stayed in) Limited (release)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audioshocker.com/2007/10/24/the-darjeeling-should-have-stayed-in-limited-release/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2007/10/24/the-darjeeling-should-have-stayed-in-limited-release</link>
	<description>Music. Movies. Comic Books. Pop Culture. Media is kind of our thing.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: neal</title>
		<link>http://www.audioshocker.com/2007/10/24/the-darjeeling-should-have-stayed-in-limited-release#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioshocker.com/2007/10/24/the-darjeeling-should-have-stayed-in-limited-release#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I'll save it for the podcast and all - but after just getting back from The Darjeeling Limited, I have to wonder - what just happened? It will take a day or two to digest this one. 

Look forward to a spirited debate regarding Wes Anderson's new flick in this week's upcoming episode!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll save it for the podcast and all - but after just getting back from The Darjeeling Limited, I have to wonder - what just happened? It will take a day or two to digest this one. </p>
<p>Look forward to a spirited debate regarding Wes Anderson&#8217;s new flick in this week&#8217;s upcoming episode!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
